
It was one of those classic mysterioso moments, where I bounced betwixt Target and BestBuy at lunch on Wednesday to see if someone would sell me a copy of
The Decemberists'
The Hazards of Love for less than $10 (hey, it's a barter economy). I tuned in to the local NPR station,
KRCC, and they were playing a
recorded live set from SXSW of The Decemberists playing their new rock opera in its entirety. Time to make some real-time comparisons.

The moniker "rock opera" makes me nervous, since it tended to meander into ostentiatiousness in the 1970s. We already had a sillier rock-opera offering in 2009, with
Benjy Ferree's overlooked
Come Back to the Five and Dime, Bobby Dee, Bobby Dee. The Decemberists have sauntered close to the format, with looser conceptual song-cycles (
The Crane Wife) and overextended single-song storytelling (
The Tain). But this new one is one of those prelude and reprise and munchkin-orchestra summits, just the thing to make me nervous.
First of all,
Harvard Courant, this isn't nearly as close to
Jethro Tull as it is to a cross between The Who's
Quadrophenia and Neil Young's
Greendale. Tull, in both
Passion Play and
Thick As a Brick, developed operatic mixed-tempo song structures that were closer to some of
Todd Rundgren's wilder efforts, usually with a single narrator telling an apocalyptic tale. Colin Meloy gives us assigned characters and parts, reaching to external vocalists Becky Stark and Shara Worden. The reliance on established characters works best when there are dueling tempos, as in 'The Wanting Comes in Waves,' when the structure sounds most like
Quadrophenia.But let's be honest. A Victorian-era tale of a love quadrangle involving woodland sprites and unwanted pregnancies doesn't grab me. When The Decemberists stay looser but brilliant, as in the aforementioned
Crane Wife or
Picaresque, it holds my interest better. Rest assured, even the apparently dumb moments of this work, like the female chorus of 'Hazards of Love Part 3,' will stick to your synapses even if you demand otherwise. But it revisits the old Tull/Who question: Does the world need more rock operas? (Nevertheless, it's bound to be in Top Ten for 2009.)